Does Frame Generation Lower Quality

Does Frame Generation Lower Quality. Nvidia's frame generation works with AMD FSR and Intel XeSS PC Gamer The logic in my plans was, get fps under 60 and see if frame generation can fill in the gaps It increases the frame rate but does nothing for the latency.

FSR 3 Frame Generation vs. AMD Fluid Motion Frames is AFMF useless? YouTube
FSR 3 Frame Generation vs. AMD Fluid Motion Frames is AFMF useless? YouTube from www.youtube.com

Sure, if you're getting high fps to start with (so probably like ~200fps with dlss2) and then add frame generation, it will feel good enough for most people, but on the other hand, I wouldn't use frame generation at that point. It increases the frame rate but does nothing for the latency.

FSR 3 Frame Generation vs. AMD Fluid Motion Frames is AFMF useless? YouTube

It's a trade-off between visual quality and processing speed. The logic in my plans was, get fps under 60 and see if frame generation can fill in the gaps - the higher the base frame rate, the smaller the frame times so the less time it takes to buffer/compare frames and the less time is being inserted between frames as a generated frame

Nvidia Frame Generation Tech Plays Nice With AMD FSR 2.0, Intel XeSS Tom's Hardware. The reason frame generation is controversial is twofold FSR 3's Frame Generation also works on the basis of Optical Flow, but it's much lower resolution, and that is visible on the final output

Nvidia's frame generation works with AMD FSR and Intel XeSS PC Gamer. So theoretically should be less input lag by comparison to lower base rates. Alongside DLSS, frame generation has also gained traction as a feature that was added in DLSS 3